Monday 23rd of May 2022
نفر 0



Question: What is the criterion of [chess] being haraam as a gambling tool? Is it the preparation with the intent of gambling or through use of urf (generally accepted practice, custom, or usage)? Also, is there any difference between an urf of a particular society and an international one?
Answer: The criterion is that it be set up for gambling and used for it, in such a manner that it is readily known as a gambling tool. It suffices to describe it accordingly in a particular society.


Question: Insofar as the melody is concerned, what is the standard of it being haraam? Is it because it is used in singing perpetrated by the people of moral depravity, indeed? also, is it sufficient to judge it by the circumstance and the occasion? Is there any difference between, for example, using music in Hussaini commemoration gatherings or processions, Islamic songs, and other occasions?
Answer: The crucial factor, too, is the occasion of such gatherings. However, its use in a commemoration or other occasion does not lift its being haraam mutlaqan (absolutely or under any circumstances), as a matter of ihtiyat.


Question: If the yardstick is the amusement or delectation, it is a grey area, for tastes and opinions vary and differ. So, when can one draw the line between halal and haraam music?
Answer: The crucial line is in it [music] being commensurate with the gatherings of entertainment and moral depravity.


Question: Some schools in Western countries compel pupils to learn dancing. Such dancing is not accompanied by singing and it is not for pastime, rather a component of the curriculum. Is it haraam for the parents to permit their children to attend such classes?
Answer: Yes, if it contravenes religious upbringing, rather in general, as a matter of ihtiyat. That is, with the assumption that the student be adult. The exception to this is that the mukallaf has a valid reason permitting his learning, such as following in taqleed (The following, by a lay person, of a learned scholar "mujtahid" in matters of religious practice). Such a mujtahid may have ruled on the permissibility of this act; there will, therefore, be no objection to him attending such a study.


Question: An artificial female organ when used by some men, they derive some enjoyment from it. If it is used without the intent of ejaculation, is it permissible? Is there a difference in the ruling between a married man and a bachelor?
Answer: Avoiding its use is recommended as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi, irrespective of whether ejaculation was intended. There is no difference in the ruling between a married man and a bachelor.


Question: Is it permissible for a Muslim to attend gatherings where alcoholic drink is served?
Answer: Eating and drinking in such gatherings is haraam. As for attending per se, its being haraam is based on necessary precaution. However, there is no harm in attending with the aim of forbidding evil, if it is possible.
0% (نفر 0)
نظر شما در مورد این مطلب ؟
امتیاز شما به این مطلب ؟
اشتراک گذاری در شبکه های اجتماعی:
لینک کوتاه

latest article

Did the wives of the Prophet poison him as narrated by al-Ayyashi?
What is the difference between Satan and the carnal soul?
The ruling for watching sex films without enjoyment/the Grand Ayatollah Sistani’s answer
The Grand Ayatollah Sistani’s view about new style eulogies
Rules of the lost property when found
Where does the domino effect of mutanajjis items stop?
When and why were the terms Ayatollah and Hujjat ul-islam began to be used to refer to ...
The ruling about eating giraffe, kangaroo, and penguin meat/the Grand Ayatollah ...
Why knowledge without educating the heart is harmful?
Where and when did mourning for Imam Hussein (A.S.) start first?

user comment